This story is published at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/battle-your-health-why-keeping-you-sick-profitable-greg-brunty?trk=prof-post
Have We All Been Wearing The Emperor's Clothes?
"Keeping you alive is the name of the game - keeping you healthy is not"
Do you know what it's like to feel twice as healthy then you have ever felt in your entire life? Of course not, because it's difficult to image beyond the parameters of what one has ever experienced - particularly when the bar is set to the realistic state of your current health and well-being.
Imagine upon conception that you begin a slide, either slippery or slight, where from the time you are born until the day you die you begin to decay inside, a particular entropy that is more less what we call 'aging'.
Imagine then if you are able to control that slope of decay.
The rate of entropy we all endure is directly related to the way we live, walk, work, sleep, diet, and exercise.
"I'm going to leave the reader a breadcrumb trail of evidence in a detailed case of conspiracy - one that has been perpetrated for well over a century"
Do you drink city tap water that is adulterated with chlorine or fluoride? Do you drink bottled water? Do you drink soda pop or Big Beverage beer? Do you splurge for good healthy organic ingredients to cook with or do you use canned and boxed foods that are more common to the average American household? Do you take vitamins or supplements? Do you consume breath fresheners such as mints or chewing gum?
Do you then take medication? Do you have disorders, like cramps, migraines, acid reflux? Do you have more serious complications like asthma, diabetes or an immunodeficiency?
Do your prescription drugs make you feel better overall, or do you feel degenerately worse? Do you find other side effects and general imbalance in your daily life as a result of medication?
"What if we are capable of maintaining a microbiota that is impervious to disease or ailment"?
- Cabal Food Chain
What if we are purposely led to believe that our current lifestyle and diet is actually detrimental to all under-educated masses and that the medical establishment of the 21st century is more precisely a cabal? They all play for the same team that say you must be vaccinated - but only what is provided - with no alternatives other than being labeled as an anti-vaxxer and a walking threat to global health. Yet the Anti-vaxxer community has a point:
"If you poison the well don't make us drink from it - allow us to dig our own well"
In other words, vaccines are intentionally created, supervised and administered exclusively by the scientific community. Yet, conceivably there are other methods of vaccinating oneself that may be technologically feasible in this day and age - considering that the rate of discoveries and philosophies behind what microbes can do. If anti-vaxxers indeed had an alternate [1] method to vaccinate themselves, the argument must provide that most anti-vaxxers would actually vaccinate.
American Medical Association and Behavioral Sciences
It is hypocritical to make argument for "science and medical consensus" when it has been proven that scientists and academics are influenced through the hubris of their peers.
Case in point: 39/100 papers [2] in the field of psychology were deemed not reproducible, citing corrupt peer reviews and industry demand for publishable material.
"Sometimes scientists fall short of the ideals of the scientific method. Especially in bio-medical research, there’s a disturbing trend toward results that can’t be reproduced outside the lab that found them, a trend that has prompted a push for greater transparency about how experiments are conducted" [3]
The American Medical Association and the field of neurosciences [4] are not faring any better - 47 of the 53 studies could not be replicated [5].
"...The scientific community considers itself to be reasonably impregnable behind the walls of Academia it has created for itself and they simply hate people who attempt to tunnel in underneath and undermine their Doctorates" [6]
Marijuana con Synthetics
'Spice' drugs such as K-2 and other pseudo cannabinoids are continually referred to as 'synthetic marijuana'.
"It creates a constricting effect to the cardiovascular system, which includes faster heart rate, which becomes life threatening as it leads to various dangers such as heart attack and stroke."
Synthetic cannabinoids are a result of laboratory experiments conducted by U.S. sponsored research. Yes, the U.S. government is responsible for the creation of Spice , K-2 and other synthetic cannabinoids.
"The term synthetic refers to a psychotropic substance manufactured by a process of full chemical synthesis"
In the 1990's, the National Institute for Drug Abuse (NIDA) funded [7] research by John W. Huffman that focused on making a drug to target endocannabinoid receptors in the body; this resulted in the discovery of a variety of synthetic substances called JHW-cannabinoids.
These are being marketed as Spice, K2, and other novelty names, enticing youth culture who are old enough to get into these shops yet not old enough to buy cigarettes; they generally cannot smoke marijuana for a variety of reasons, including drug testing for jobs they hold. The deception in the media to emulate JWH-synthetics to marijuana culture has effectively drawn youth to the glamor of bath salt abuse, much as Joe Camel did for teenage cigarette smoking in the late '80's.
In 1970 the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) authored the professional opinion that "Marijuana is not physically addictive, though some users do become psychologically dependent on the drug", which paved the way for the Drug Enforcement Administration to place it on the drug dealers table, right beside heroin and cocaine: a schedule 1 narcotic.
And because the U.S. Government subscribes solely to the opinion of NIDA and the cherry-picked research carried out exclusively at the Mississippi Farm, no other institution in the U.S. has ever been authorized to grow or study the use and effects of marijuana for research.
"NIDA has a government granted monopoly on the production of medical marijuana for research purposes. In the past, the institute has refused to supply marijuana to researchers who had obtained all other necessary federal permits. Medical marijuana researchers and activists claim that NIDA, which is not supposed to be a regulatory organization, does not have the authority to effectively regulate who does and doesn't get to do research with medical marijuana."
Dr. Mahmoud ElSohly, the head of the marijuana research program at Ole' Miss since 1981, is ostentatious in his regard for smoking marijuana; in a handful of sourced stories, he lends an obvious disdain for recreational use, including his partisan mannerisms and assumed authority in law. "We have to make the distinction that this is an approval by referendum, rather than an approval by regulatory testing and due process," he is quoted as saying.
"They get something off the street without knowing the potency of what they are smoking, and before they realize they've had too much, it's already too late," says ElSohly.
Too late? Dr. Mahmoud ElSholy explains, "The psychoactivity of high-potency marijuana is really not a pleasant thing. People get paranoid and very irritable, almost violent sometimes."
Almost violent sometimes are key words one need only focus on: the wordplay is a brazen attempt at hyperbole, which in typical fashion of 20th-century politics, a textbook style play on fear. Compare the effects of marijuana to those of JHW-synthetics: one can make you irritable; the other can kill you.
And fear there most certainly is - of Big Pharma taking control of U.S marijuana production. Remember, it was the NIDA laboratory that discovered JHW-cannabinoids. Where was the NIDA warning to the Drug Enforcement Agency regarding the risks of JHW-cannabinoid use?
You can still buy it around town.
To add insult to injury, science now acknowledges that cannabis is anti-fungal, anti cancerous [8] and when the U.S. Government was busy making it illegal for anyone else in the world to study its inherent effect's , they conducted their own research through the National Institute for Drug Abuse and Ole' Miss, which lead to a very quiet patent [8] filing when no one else was legally able to possess it. If that was not enough, Monsanto recently managed to file a patent on genetically modified marijuana - despite the fact that cannabis is still a schedule 1 narcotic.
But does the deceit stop there? No, it goes back to the very beginning. The medical establishment never stopped lying - the AMA began through lies.
The Federal government have been for hire to special interest groups at least since they went into the federal income tax racket. Possibly one of the U.S. government's' biggest clients in history had been the American Medical Association.
The Harrison Act of 1946
In 1937 the American Medical Association, along with practicing physicians and pharmacists convened a House Ways and Means committee to offer scientific testimony regarding tax and regulation of cannabis. At issue were the current 'Marihuana' rules imposed for medicinal extraction, manufacturing and prescribing by physicians.
The AMA - or more precisely, the lawyer who represented them - had blatantly purged one of the most beneficial plant species in world. What began as an innocuous newspaper editorial had steamrolled into the repudiation of cannabis, repressing a natural medicinal substance based on sheer fallacy of science policy.
At that time the U.S. government had no authority to regulate medicine and had even refused to sign an earlier draft of the 1936 Geneva Trafficking Convention which was deemed "too weak, especially in relation to extradition, extraterritoriality and the confiscation of trafficking profits"; despite this, cannabis was nevertheless slated for prohibition. But in order to comply with the Geneva Convention - which included criminalizing cannabis in all 198 nations - the government had to find a way to regulate it. The Marihuana Tax Act of 1937 proposal proved to be the work around the government needed - by forcing the hand of the medical establishment.
"The American Medical Association (AMA) opposed the act because the tax was imposed on physicians prescribing cannabis, retail pharmacists selling cannabis, and medical cannabis cultivation and manufacturing; instead of enacting the Marijuana Tax Act the AMA proposed cannabis be added to the Harrison [9] Narcotics Tax Act" and made illegal for recreational and medicinal uses.
The American Medical Association was to blame for the deletion of cannabis from the pharmacopoeia, an indisputably boorish [10] act in retrospect.
"If (Marijuana) were unknown, its discovery would no doubt be hailed as a medical breakthrough", writes the Economist, "Scientists would praise its potential for treating everything from pain to cancer and marvel at its rich pharmacopoeia; many of whose chemicals mimic vital molecules in the human body."
The study of marijuana has led science to the discovery of cannabinoids and their interactive behavior with receptors in the human brain. Sadly, through the politics of the AMA the medical community they preside over had to wait more than 50 years for cannabis reemerge clearing a path to the discovery of the human endocannabinoid [11] system.
Setting The So-Called 'Establishment'
There was gold in them there hills, and those hills were American's and their hard earned cash at the close of World War I. The common proletariat lived meagerly, oft in squalor and made ends meet by eating nearly anything that was edible - that would not kill you.
A self-taught scientist had been touring the medical circuit giving sweeping lectures on fantastic new technology he had invented. This man's claim and proofs of success was what post-war America needed - cheap, non-invasive treatment for anything from common ailments to viscous types of deadly cancer.
To another man this technology was simply snake oil.
"A fact could be either a shared truth, or a shared delusion, depending on what era you're living in and how far along human civilization has progressed" [1]
Between these two men, a stage was set for what was to become the greatest infringement on human health - affecting each and every life of the millions of people who have lived and died from that period of time - 1930 [12] to present.
One man used a ray beam to cure cancer; the other used x-rays.
Morris Fishbein, head of the American Medical Association had been known as an alternative healer before taking on the reins of the newly ordained - though hardly credible - high brow institution. Treatment for cancer at the time included newly implemented technology called x-rays: these were radiation rays that were set to 'cook' and applied generously to the patient. Many people died very quickly through these dark years as post-war America "practiced" what would become modern medicine.
Unlike "Doctor" Fishbein, Raymond Royal Rife knew exactly what a microbe was - after all he had seen one up close. This might seem like an ordinary skill given the technology available in now, but back in 1930, it was a staggering feat. In fact, the microscope Ray Rife constructed - and what was subsequently demolished - is a heart-wrenching tale in that another electron scope of its capability would not be reproduced again until the next century.
The first optical microscope was comprised of over 4,000 custom parts specially designed by Rife that could view bacteria at a magnification of 31,000 x. Additionally, the Rife microscope was able to view microorganisms alive and record their actions. Rife was the first microbiologist to study active microbes and develop therapies that cured cancer.
Mortal Oscillatory Resonance (MOR) Frequencies
Rife found that microbes attack cells by invading the nucleus and taking over control, much like stealing a car. He then developed a therapy based on radio frequencies that besieged the microbe assailant much like electromagnetic pulse technology - in simple terms, the microbes who caused the cells to become cancerous were blasted to death through a bombardment of specific frequencies.
The clinical studies Rife performed were highly successful and lauded as remarkable achievements in the field of human health. Rife's results were subsequently published in medical journals and he went on to lecture at prestigious colleges throughout the country.
Fishbein allegedly offered Rife a 'buy out' for his MOR frequency technology; when Rife refused to sell his invention, his laboratory, microscope and notes were allegedly looted and burned as a consequence. Medical journals that had published his studies would later - under pressure from the AMA - retract, discredit, contradict and rewrite the work of Raymond Rife near completely out of existence.
Meanwhile, the world had cancer; there was money to be made.
"If the for-profit cancer industry really wanted to help people, it would work to put itself out of business by creating a world without cancer" [1]
Thick As A Brick
Jethro Tull (The band borrowed the name) was a 17th century English farmer who had once claimed that plant roots are comprised of millions of little tiny mouths that chomp down on pieces of soil, eating dirt particles so to speak. Therefore, he reasoned, if the dirt were minced, or tilled into smaller pieces, the plants would more easily consume the earth.
This was the introduction to 300 years of arduous labors of soil tilling and the grossly-negligent practice of carbon dioxide releasing - turning up arable farmland and exposing microbial life to harmful ultraviolet rays - all so that plant root 'baby mouths' can 'chew up' dirt a little easier.
Except now we know that roots actually 'eat' a complex compound of the nutrients we feed them. Fertilizers contain hardly any plant-available nutrients; added nutrients must first be converted over into complex compounds by microorganisms, and are then transported by said microbes to the rhizome - or the root lining. These then are exchanged for microbial food, or what are known as exudes.
By comparison is the fluoride debate where it seems broken down to tooth health rather than over all health effects on the human body over a lifetime, and the inability to titrate - or regulate - levels of intake. Fluoride is in everything from canned food to tea, from mints to beer, from vitamins to bottled water - there is no way to control titration.
For instance, if health experts found that barium [13] "in small amounts" helped to foster fingernail and toenail sheen, then the norm might be to establish barium-infused enemas following bowel movements - all in the name of healthy nail growth. And while the experts run study after study to determine if in fact, barium did indeed help as a natural nail fungicide one's overall life longevity is curtailed and nary none the wiser- mostly because it was intended all along; any toxins can alter the microbiota.
Glucose is fast becoming the body's number one cause of disease; refined sugar has been shoveled down American's throats in heaping spoonfuls while other alternative sweetener competitors are simply rubbed [14] out. Even while stevia, sugar alcohols and miraculin extracts are a good way to avoid diabetes, it so happens that glucose is one of two serious culprits that foment cancer: researchers have demonstrated [15] how cancer cells use glucose to generate the building blocks of cellular compounds that are needed for rapid tumor growth.
It's no secret that diabetes and heart disease runs rampant: more than a 60 billion dollar toll on the healthcare system is projected, yet research indicates that no one should have [16] these diseases in the first place.
Disease prevention simply is not profitable - proponents of the fruit berry miraculin learned hard lessons when they tried to join Big Sugar in the sweetener industry.
"Miralin's main competitor at the time was a company called GD Searle, which pushed its sweetener aspartame through FDA approval via potentially shady means" [14]
Developed in the 1960's by bio-medical student Robert Harvey, the miraculin berry threatened to dissolve the sugar industry by introducing an all-natural additive that made anything sour taste sweet. This was no small matter; Miralin, the company that would manufacture miraculin extract was poised to disrupt not just Big Sugar, but destabilize a cornered market ruled by healthcare.
And while clever [17] stories are written to support mainstream healthcare, other organizations who are devoted to disease prevention [18] seem to reside irreverently on the fringe. ♣
℘
The Battle For Your Health: Why Keeping You Sick Is Profitable by Greg A.Brunty is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Parts of this work was republished from alter ego Scotch Branwell.This work was originally published at microbialgarden.com by Greg A. Brunty.
℘
Footnotes:
[1]http://www.naturalnews.com/051286_The_Atlantic_Health_Ranger_lost_interview.htl
[2] http://www.nature.com/news/first-results-from-psychology-s-largest-reproducibility-test-1.17433
[6] http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/archivos_pdf/earth_forbiddensecrets 01.pdf
[7] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_W._Huffman
[9]http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/chris/2007/04/03/1953_fitzgerald_report_suppressed_cancer_treatments.htm
[11] http://www.druglibrary.org/Schaffer/hemp/taxact/woodward.htm
[11] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endocannabinoid_system
[14] http://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/the-miracle-sugar-substitute-the-fda-wont-let-you-have
[15] https://theconversation.com/starving-cancer-cells-of-sugar-could-be-the-key-to-future-treatment-47906
[16] http://www.greenmedinfo.com/search/google-cse#gsc.q=blog alert certified organic food grown us foundcontaminated glyphosate herbicide
[17] http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2015/03/science-doubters/achenbach-text
[18] http://www.naturalnews.com/026076_PSA_capsaicin_cancer.html
